Resistance against the Israeli blockade of Gaza?!

Stellan Vinthagen January 4th, 2009

Some people in the network have been discussing an idea of a “Ship to Gaza”: breaking the inhumane and criminal blockade of Gaza’s 1,5 million people by sailing a boat into Gaza. The idea is to create a “people-to-people” solidarity by involving a broad coalition of people movements (from various political and religious strands) and collect materials that are needed in Gaza (medicine, clothes, seeds, toys, etc.).

The boat would take off from Sweden and travel during several weeks through a number of harbors (Glasgow, Amsterdam, etc.) and collect supplies to the people in Gaza, as well as hold political and cultural events in these towns. In order to get more media attention and to create a necessary protection against aggressive attacks from Israel there is a need to have a number of international VIP on board. If we would succeed to have e.g. Desmond Tutu on board the last part of the trip from Cyprus to Gaza it would be very, very difficult for the Israeli Navy to sink the ship. The broad civil society involvement created by various groups and the media attention created would hopefully help to create a pressure on the politicians in Europe. We have contacts in Gaza and Palestine and will collaborate with them in the work. Still, the Ship to Gaza is not an act of solidarity with Hamas. It is an act of solidarity with the people in Gaza. It is thought of as a political people-to-people solidarity act, against the inhumane and criminal acts of Israel as shown in several UN resolutions and by e.g. the UN Human Rights officer for Palestine, Richard Falk.

The “Free Gaza Movement” has already brought six smaller boats on such missions the last months. Five have reached Gaza despite threats from the Israeli Navy. The last one, “rammed a Israeli Navy ship which was damaged”, according to the spokes-woman from Israel…, i.e. the small Free Gaza boat was so badly damaged by the aggressive Navy attack that it started to leak water and had to turn to Lebanon. Now the Free Gaza Movement is asking for more international participants for coming boats in the near future.

Our idea of a larger boat with several containers with supplies to Gaza will take time, money, and a lot of organising.  We don’t know if we will find the needed interest and resources to make it happen. But in these days of the war crimes in Gaza it feels even more compelling to act.

At this initial stage we welcome suggestions, criticism, contacts, information, or volunteers who would like to join us. Please feel free to comment here or send an email directly to stellan.vinthagen[at]resistancestudies.org

There will be first meetings in Stockholm (11 25 Jan) and Gothenburg (18 Jan) in which it will become clear if enough people are willing to organise this needed resistance.

Resistance Studies Network and Rsmag in interview

Christopher Kullenberg December 17th, 2008

The university paper GU-journalen has made an interview with Christopher Kullenberg regarding the future of Resistance Studies, Resistance Studies Magazine and open-access publishing. Quote:

“We want to raise awareness of current resistance activities. There is a great variety of perspectives and angles of approach to the study of resistance movements. People come from various disciplines and this is very rewarding. We don’t always understand each other but it is better to disagree than to have a common view of the world. That would be a far greater loss. But we have no intentions of making resistance studies to a resistance science”, Christopher Kullenberg explains.

Read the full article here.

Creating histories of authenticity and resistance: Race, ethnicity and the right to land in Brazil

Stellan Vinthagen December 16th, 2008

Next RESISTANCE STUDIES SEMINAR Dec 18 (15-17 at Annedalsseminariet, see above at “Seminars”) is with Post-Doc Patricia Lorenzoni. You are all welcome! This is her handout for the seminar: 

 

Dear Seminar attendees,

My research concerns the relation between claims on land, ethnic minorities and history in Brazil. Working with readings of legislative and other official documents, I am exploring how the understanding of the historical relationship between the State and different minority groups sets a framework for the negotiations of rights.

 

Below is a series of translated passages from four different documents. The first is the Estatuto do Índio, the main legislative document regulating the relation between the Brazilian state and the indigenous minorities. Although this document from 1973 is on several points incongruent with the current constitution from 1988, due to the impossibility to reach an agreement in all necessary instances on a new legislation, the Estatuto do Índio is still in force. The second document is the democratic constitution from 1988.

 

Following these documents are excerpts from Programa Brasil Quilombola, a booklet published in 2004 by the government special secretariat on promoting politics of racial equality (Seppir). The publication is an explanation of the government program with the same name and launched the same year. This program aims at the recognition and non-assimilationist integration of descendants of quilombos, or maroon societies (i.e., descendants of fugitive slaves). Quoted is also from the regulations of Incra (the government authority for land reform) on the definition of a quilombo.

 

A note on the translations: I have kept certain Portuguese terms in the texts (such as quilombo, negro and índio) since they carry connotations that are not easily translatable into other languages and contexts. My presentation will revolve around the quotations below, and also around these terms and how they are used.

 

1. Estatuto do Índio, 1973, article 1:

This law regulates the legal situation of índios or silvícolas and of indigenous communities, with the purpose of preserving their culture and integrate them, progressive and harmoniously, into the national communion.

 

2. Estatuto do Índio, 1973, art 11:

Through decree by the President of the Republic, the emancipation of the indigenous community and its members can be declared, from the tutelary regime established by law, to the full integration into the national communion, this if it is demanded by the majority in the group and proven in inquiry realized by a competent federal organ.

 

3. The Constitution of Brazil, 1988, art 231, §§1-2:

For the índios are recognized their social organization, habits, languages, beliefs and traditions, and the original right to the lands that they traditionally occupy, falling on the Union to demarcate them, protect and make respected all of their goods. Lands traditionally occupied by índios are those where they live in permanent character, those used for their productive activities, those that are indispensable for the preservation of the environmental recourses necessary for their well-being and those necessary for their physical and cultural reproduction, according to their habits and traditions.

 

4. The Constitution of Brazil, 1988, art 232:

The Índios, their communities and organizations are legitimate parts to enter into court to defend their rights and interests.

 

5. Programa Brasil Quilombola, 2004, p. 9:

It is more plausible to affirm that the connection to the past [in the quilombo] resides in the maintenance of practices of resistance and reproduction of one’s way of life in a determined locality where the collectivization of material and immaterial goods remain. In this way, communities remnants of quilombos are social groups whose ethnic identity distinguish them from the rest of society.

 

6. Programa Brasil Quilombola, 2004, p. 10:

The ethnic identity of a group is the base for its form of organization, its relation to other groups and for its political action.

 

7. Instrução normativa no 16, Incra, 2004:

The characteristics of remnants of quilombola communities should be attested through auto-definition of the community. Auto-definition should be demonstrated through a simple written declaration from the interested community, with specifications of negro ancestry, historical trajectory, resistance against oppression, cults and habits.

 

 

A note on the uprising in Greece (a most tragic event and a killing of a teenager)

Niklas Hansson December 16th, 2008

Affective contagion and Politics as Protests entering 6th Day Following Fatal Police Shooting of TeenIn Greece and capital city Athens, as everybody knows, there has been a series of protests and riots following the tragic killing of a teenager. With all due respect to the victims of these events (family, friends and others related) it also shows the power of affect in a tragic situation like this. A moment filled with anger, brutality and hostility towards the Greek government and the Police is also an air of contentious feelings, impulses jumping between bodies and affects minds. A certain emotional tenor had already been potentialized following massive strikes over pension reform and privatizations, furthering the economic crises in Greece, and large portions of the Greek population could be said to express a certain degree of bodily distress over this situation – bodies were open and in a state of pre-action or proto-active-body-state “tending” towards action (see Massumi 2002) Within a series of violent images across global and national mediascapes (producing sights of action passing via functional technological vectors [Virilio]) there were for example the images of schoolgirls and schoolboys surrounding police offices, literally expressing a wall of resistance with their movements, rhythm and bodily texture; forming a collective body of action, that worked as transversal vectors of affect via media and resonated within other sectors such as the bodies of university staff, teachers and union workers. They were intensive patterns of information or “tipping points” [DeLanda, 1997], small scale events working as catalyzers in a protest cycle, which could possibly turn the social order out of balance and into a far-from-equilibrium state, an intensified “revolutionary” order which self-organized at another basin of attraction [DeLanda 2006]. Already mobilized audiences/receptors worked as material that recharged and furthered the affective intensity, transferred it into action as their bodily disposition (potential for action) had been actualized by prior distress and disappointment with the government’s handling of the economic, political and social situation in Greece. Deleuze and Guattari writes about this kind of resistance as “countersignifying semiotic”; with their practices they showed their disrespect for the imposed order and the leading government politicians’ cry for national unity in a time of crises. Anger exploded in the streets, worked its way blindly across ethnic, gender and class divisions and took bodies as its medium for self-sustainment. Fully social and pre-individual in its affective state, actualized as the feeling of rage and activated in direct action against the perpetrators and representatives of the state such as office buildings, policemen and so on. In an interview in the magazine Democracy Now! (http://www.democracynow.org/2008/12/11/greek_uprising_protests_riots_strikes_enter), student and activist Nikos Lountos (Socialist Worker’s Party) spoke about the riots and lays out the workings of the affective images: […] “So, we are in the middle of an unprecedented wave of actions now and protests and riots. It all started on Saturday evening at around 9:00 p.m., when a policeman patrolling the Exarcheia neighborhood in Athens shot and murdered in cold blood the fifteen-year-old schoolboy Alexis. The first response was an attempt to cover up the killing. The police claimed that they had been attacked. But the witnesses all around were too many for this cover-up to happen. So, all the witnesses say that it was a direct shot. So even the government, in just a few hours, had to claim that it will move against the police, trying to calm the anger. But the anger exploded in the streets. In three, four hours, all the streets around Athens were filled with young people demonstrating against the police brutality. The anti-capitalist left occupied the law school in the center of Athens and turned it into headquarters for action. And on Sunday, there was the first mass demonstration. Thousands of people of every age marched towards the police headquarters and to the parliament. And the next day, on Monday, all this had turned into a real mass movement all around Greece. What was the most striking was that in literally every neighborhood in every city and town, school students walked out of their school on Monday morning. So you could see kids from eleven to seventeen years old marching in the streets wherever you could be in Greece, tens of thousands of school students, maybe hundreds of thousands, if you add all the cities. So, all around Athens and around Greece, there were colorful demonstration of schoolboys and schoolgirls. Some of them marched to the local police stations and clashed with the police, throwing stones and bottles. And the anger was so really thick that policemen and police officers had to be locked inside their offices, surrounded by thirteen- and fourteen-year-old boys and girls. The picture was so striking that it produced a domino effect. The trade unions of teachers decided an all-out strike for Tuesday. The union of university lecturers decided a three-day strike. And so, there was the already arranged, you know, the strike you mentioned for Wednesday against the government’s economic policies, so the process was generalizing and still generalizes. Everybody acknowledges that even the riots, the big riots—you may have seen the videos—they are a social phenomenon, not just the result of some political incident. There were thousands of angry young people that came out in the streets to clash with the police and smash windows of banks, of five-star hotels and expensive stores. So, that’s true. It was something that waited to happen. I think it’s a mixture of things. We have a government that’s—a government of the ruling party called New Democracy, a very right-wing government. It has tried to make many attacks on working people and students, especially students. The students were some form of guinea pigs for the government. When it was elected after 2004, they tried—the government tried to privatize universities, which are public in Greece, and put more obstacles for school students to get into university. The financial burden on the poor families if they want their children to be educated is really big in Greece. And the worst is that even if you have a university degree, even if you are a doctor or lawyer, in most cases, young people get a salary below the level of poverty in Greece. So the majority of young people in Greece stay with their families ’til their late twenties, many ’til their thirties, in order to cope with this uncertainty. And so, this mixture, along with the economic crisis and their unstable, weak government, was what was behind all this explosion.” […]

Shoe Resistance

Magid Shihade December 15th, 2008

 Dear Friends,

I have just read and signed the petition: “In Support of the Iraqi Shoe-Throwing Journalist”.

Please take a moment to read about this important issue, and join me in signing the petition. It takes just 30 seconds, but can truly make a difference. We are trying to reach 100000 signatures - please sign here: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/9/in-support-of-the-iraqi-shoe-throwing-journalist

Once you have signed, you can help even more by asking your friends and family to sign as well.

Thank you! Magid

http://www.care2.com/go/z/e/VdK7/qM../AoBr3


Care2.com, Inc.
275 Shoreline Drive, Suite 300
Redwood City, CA 94065
http://www.care2.com

Rsmag.org gives the Swedish parliament a Christmas present

Christopher Kullenberg December 10th, 2008

Due to recent repressive legislation following the implementation of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED 1), where corporativistic media industries are allowed to pursue their own private investigations in order to sue, fine and disrespect people who infringe on copyright, the Resistance Studies Magazine will donate a digital copy of the magazine to the Swedish parliament, in order to affirm the free distribution of knowledge and information.

Editor Christopher Kullenberg announces:

- For centuries the printing press has not only been a gate-keeper for the distribution of knowledge, it has also been fragile towards censorship, and highly dependent on economical interests. Of course, some actors in the media industries wish to conserve this order. The internet allows for the Resistance Studies Magazine to distribute articles globally, without spending more than a few Euros to host our site. Academic knowledge does not have to be trapped in the claws of anti-market institutions, such as the great publishing houses. We can destabilize these power-relations by way of creativity and sharing. As long as the Internet is uncensored, which unfortunately is not the case, not in Sweden, and not in other countries either, anyone can download our articles for free. In the long run, this European Union directive will lead only to building protective walls against the free transfer of knowledge.

The Resistance Studies Magazine does not wish the members of the Swedish parliament a merry christmas because the Internet knows far too many great holidays which may be summarised in kopimism.

International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest, 1500 to the Present

jj December 9th, 2008

A new impressive Encyclopedia is soon out. In eight volumes the editor Immanuel Ness has collected articles on Revolutions and Protests the last 500 years. This work is a must for all institutions and researchers with focus on resistance, history, social movements, and/or democracy. The books will be presented and discussed at one of the Resistance Studies Seminars in 2009.

If you want to check it out take a look here: http://www.revolutionprotestencyclopedia.com/

Suggestions for next semester of Resistance Seminars?

Stellan Vinthagen December 7th, 2008

The third semester of the Gothenburg University Resistance Seminars is coming to an end. We are collecting ideas and suggestions for the fourth semester, from Jan to June 2009. If you have any ideas of important texts, interesting perspectives or persons for our seminars, feel free to contact the seminar organizer: Stellan Vinthagen (type without spaces: stellan. vinthagen @ resistancestudies. org).

Some ideas which so far have been discussed; Freud’s theory of resistance in therapy; file-sharing and the digital “Pirates”; ETA and the Basque armed resistance; Economics and resistance; Theology and resistance; etc. We are also in the next coming months publishing the first Swedish “reader” in resistance studies (”Motstånd”, Liber, 2009) which needs to be discussed. Several authors which publish chapters in the book have earlier presented their drafts/thoughts at the seminars, but not all. And, during Feb we will have two panels at the International Studies Association in New York, when several interesting papers will be presented.

So, there exists a number of ideas and possibilities for our coming seminars. Still, we want more suggestions, in order not to be limiting the understanding of what “resistance studies” can be. Rather we want to expand and challenge the existing limits and focus of our field of inquiry.

Thus, feel welcome to suggest topics/texts/persons; wherever you live in the world, irrespective if you are able to attend our Gothenburg seminars.

All the best,

Stellan

Gothenburg Seminar: Scientific discourse and Resistance

Stellan Vinthagen November 30th, 2008

At next Gothenburg Resistance Studies Seminar, the 4 Dec, PhD-student Gunilla Priebe will discuss scientific discourse and resistance, building on her coming dissertation. (For practical information on times and place, see above on “Seminars”).

Here is her presentation of the seminar:

The title of the seminar is “Who is the expert? Re-defining scientific quality standards as a source of resistance towards colonially ascribed identities”, and it draws on the last chapters of my forthcoming (Dec. -09) dissertation in Theory of Science, Gothenburg University, Sweden.

My dissertation has so far not explicitly dealt with issues of resistance or used theories explicitly discussing resistance, and it is therefore my hope that the seminar is going to give useful comments on this theme as I can see its presence in every “corner” of my material, and this paper is therefore an introduction to my dissertation rather than a set presentation of resistance strategies, theories etc.

The empirical case in focus of my dissertation is the international research alliance The Multilateral Initiative on Malaria (se below), but the aim has not been to evaluate the MIM, but instead to analyse it and present a background for why certain actors felt this kind of initiative was needed. The dissertation therefore studies activities carried out within the alliance and ideas expressed by researchers linked to this alliance in order to show in what ways micro-scientific events (fact making activities) are related to macro-phenomena such as historical and global discourses.

Also, I have struggled with questions regarding the gap between research and their sites of implementation (in this case: whether a philosophical and sociological analysis of malaria research can be of relevance to science policy entities, people working within organisations like the MIM, etc.), i.e. on a personal level the aim of this work has also been to investigate whether the “ivory tower syndrome” of such an abstract and theoretical discipline like Theory of Science is inescapable or not, and the seminar is therefore invited to comment also on this theme.
When reading the following text I ask you to kindly bear in mind that this is “work in progress”, that the text is meant to serve as a background for the seminar and that it therefore only very briefly presents a few aspects of an immensely complex topic. The text is thus a point of departure for a discussion and I welcome your input and critique, but disapprove of anybody quoting these embryonic thoughts of mine.

Kind regards, Gunilla Priebe

The ‘War on Terror’ Perspectives from the Global South

Stellan Vinthagen November 26th, 2008

[Please forward to all who may be interested]

On 11-12 December 2008, the Centre for the Study of ‘Radicalisation’ and Contemporary Political Violence (CSRV), based in the Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University, will host a conference exploring perspectives on the ‘War on Terror’ as it is seen and experienced in the Global South.. The conference is part of a series of seminars, funded by the ESRC with additional financial support from BISA, on under-studied aspects of what is variably called ‘terrorism’, ‘political violence’ or ‘radicalisation’, but which for reasons of inclusivity we refer to as ‘political violence’. The aim of this conference is to provide a forum for scholars engaged in considering the ‘War on Terror’ from a Southern perspective, and to encourage scholars with knowledge in this field to focus on this rather neglected topic. Research focusing on this topic is rather thin on the ground, and we hope that this conference will go some way towards addressing this deficit.

Drawing both on regional studies and thematic analysis, the conference is organised in three panels: The ‘War on Terror’: Regional Implications; The Effect and Effectiveness of Counter Terror Policies in the ‘War on Terror’; and Human Rights and the ‘War on Terror’. The conference will finish with a plenary session, drawing together themes and issues from these discussions. Speakers will engage with the experience of the ‘War on Terror’ in a wide range of regions and countries: Latin America; Africa in general; Uganda and Tanzania; Morocco; Turkey; Pakistan; India; the Phillipines; and Sri Lanka. Issues considered include the securitisation and the politicization of aid; militarization; impacts on peace processes and domestic politics; repression; counter-insurgency policy; Islamism; and anti-terror legislation.

A sponsorship has allowed low fees, just £50 for staff, and £35 for students.

For more details, and a booking form, please visit: http://www.aber.ac.uk/interpol/en/research/conferences.htm
Or alternatively, email the conference administrator, Charlie Thame at

cet06 @ aber . ac. uk (type the address without spaces when you email)

Call for papers: Resistance Studies Magazine 2009#1

Christopher Kullenberg November 23rd, 2008

[please re-publish this message widely]

The Resistance Studies Magazine is calling for papers to the next general issue, expected to be published in late January, 2009.

We will consider:

- Theoretical and empirical articles on power, resistance and social change.

- Reviews of scholarly articles and books.

The 2009#1 issue, we will be published as an open-access issue on rsmag.org. The Resistance Studies Magazine is a fully peer-reviewed journal, publishing scholarly articles in the spirit of openness and sharing.

Submission dead line: December 31, 2008.

Your article may at a later stage be re-published in a printed book, as the Resistance Studies Magazine aims at publishing a yearly collection of journal articles in a reader. 

For further information, please see our Submission guidelines availible at rsmag.org

Questions and suggestions may be directed to editor Christopher Kullenberg (christopher.kullenberg@theorysc.gu.se).

  (PS. Please join our Facebook group for swift information on updates, and the possibility of meeting other people who are interested in Resistance Studies Ds.)

The ethics of resistance II: Resistance and human rights

Stellan Vinthagen November 13th, 2008

Here Associate Professor in Practical Ethics, Bengt Brülde, Gothenburg University and University of West, Sweden, is presenting his arguments for the next Gothenburg based Resistance Studies Seminar (see “Seminars” for more practical information): 

My central question is when (under what conditions, on what grounds) it is morally right to resist, and when it is morally wrong. Or more specifically: (i) When is it morally permitted, and (ii) when is it morally obligatory, i.e. wrong not to resist? I will also touch upon the question of the proper target (against what or whom resistance should be directed) and the appropriate ends, but I will not discuss what forms or means of resistance that are most morally acceptable, i.e. how one ought to resist when it is right to resist.

So, when is it right to fight, challenge, eliminate, reduce, undermine, stop or obstruct powerful agents? For example, when, if ever, is it justifiable (permissible or even obligatory) to challenge or resist the law, either the law as a whole or certain aspects of the law? Here are a few suggestions [more suggestions are welcome!]:

1. It might be justified to resist if there are substantive injustices that can be reduced or eliminated. Unjust acts, practices, procedures, rules, laws, or systems, e.g. oppression, violation of rights, torture, exploitation, or corruption, can all justify resistance.

2. Illegitimate power: Is it acceptable to resist any agent whose power is illegitimate, e.g. a dictatorial state or immoral corporation (regardless of what the moral status of their acts are). In the political case, legitimacy can, in part, be spelled out in the following terms: (a) All governments have a duty to respect, protect, and fulfil the rights of the people (a substantive condition). If it does not do this (if it does not, to a sufficient extent, govern for the people) it has no legitimate authority, and the people can legitimately resist the government, in some case maybe even overthrow it. For example, resistance may well be defensible in situations of “legal alienation”, e.g. where the government abuses its power, where it is acting against the welfare of the people, or where it violates or fails to protect or fulfil people’s rights. (b) Is it ok to resist if the government is not of or by the people, i.e. not democratic? (A procedural condition)

On this type of view, negative states of affairs like widespread suffering, unhappiness, poverty etc. can only be a ground for resistance if it counts as an injustice, e.g. if someone is responsible for it. For example, in the case of severe deprivation, there is a right to resistance (against the state) only if the poverty is caused by the state, or if it is caused by persistent and grave institutional failures, e.g. if the law is blind to the relevant deprivations. And to the extent that the global order is responsible?

It seems that we need a comprehensive theory of justice, a theory of rights, a theory of legitimacy, and a theory of responsibility. This time, I will focus on rights. The basic idea is this: If some powerful agent violates human rights (in the broad sense), e.g. if it does not respect, protect, or fulfil human rights, then resistance may well be the most appropriate response. Some violations are worse than others, however, e.g. actively violating a right may be worse than failing to protect it or promote it.

So, how should we identify rights violations (and violators)? To answer this question, we need to what human (and civil) rights we have, what duties these rights imply (and who are the duty-bearers), on what grounds rights can be justified, and who is responsible for fulfilling our rights, e.g. how the corresponding duties should be allocated.

Resistance Studies Panel Video out now!

Christopher Kullenberg November 5th, 2008

At the conference Cognitive Capital and Spaces of Mobility, the Resistance Studies Network arranged a panel. The video capture can be watched here (or download it here). Participants include José Manuel Viegas Neve, Marco Schirone and Stellan Vinthagen. It is almost two hours long, but if you couldn’t make it to the conference or have a general interest in resistance research, this video is for you!

(Extra) Seminar on “Color Revolutions”

Stellan Vinthagen October 30th, 2008

On Thursday 6 Nov we will have an extra seminar; on “Color Revolutions”. Asya Leonova will present her ongoing research on the theme. The concept has come into fashion after the peaceful revolutions in Serbia, Ukraine, Georgia, Lebanon, etc the recent years (see eg the most recent articles in New York Times and The Canadian refering to the concept). Asya is in the beginning of her researh and wants an early input from the network on her research. Two related papers on the theme is part of the material for the seminar (download paper 1, and paper 2). Asya will shortly before the seminar as well publish a short seminar text.

For a brief introduction to the theme, check Wikipedia’s entry on the concept, or the article by Chaulia on Open Democracy. For those of you who want to come to the seminar with well prepared understanding of the theories behind, check the relevant texts on the resource site of International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.

The seminar will deal with the diversity of consequences that the “color factor” had on both governmental policies toward protest activities, and, broader, on any collective grassroot action, and on the patterns of association, repertoirs and framing on the side of the protesters themselves.

You are all welcome! If you are new to the debate on colored revolutions or someone already doing research on it, as is the Scandinavian Research Seminar on Nonviolence, which will participate. (The seminar will happen at 13-15 and will be followed by the ordinary seminar, this time on the Surveillance society and resistance, se the programme at “Seminars”).

Tactics or strategies of resistance?!

Stellan Vinthagen October 2nd, 2008

I have for a long time regarded strategies as more important than tactics, viewing it as more valuable to change society, its structures and power relations, not just changing situations, personal relations or temporary conditions. This is if we understand tactics, in line with the classic war researcher Clausewitz, as how to win the battle, and strategy as how to use the battles in order to win the war. For long, my hierarchical ordering of strategy over tactics has felt so natural that I have not felt compelled to question it.

But for some time I have realised that my way of giving priority to the long-term, fundamental change and kind of macro-view on struggles are to simplified and biased. It is problematic because the more oppressed you are and the longer you have been oppressed, the more natural it feels and the more it becomes part of you. In that situation, in that context of naturalized oppression, even internalized oppression, revoluionary change, or just radical and fundamental change becomes utopian. In that situation, the most important step, the most valuable approach, is to expand the room for surviving, living, self-respect, community or need-satisfaction.

The seemingly “smaller” victory through a number of tactical moves, like e.g. self-defence, autonomous activity, self-sustainability, avoidance, silence, irony, playing dumb, theft or lies, becomes a much bigger victory. Bigger since it gives the space to do more resistance and sustains the life, needs and self-confidence (thus, empower) subordinates. Anything else is impossible and does not build on any social or material base. Any realistic strategy of resistance need to build on such a socio-material base (which is what Scott suggest with his theories on “everyday resistance”, I think).

This, advocating “strategies” for people living in a situation without tactical victories, or at least tactical struggles, means that we are living in the world of ideas without contact with the realities of resistance, only shouting from our emptieness in the desert.

Like in war, if you don’t have any successful battles to build on, you can’t win any war.

Video section launched

Christopher Kullenberg September 20th, 2008

video section has been created on resistancestudies.org. The aim is to collect clips of seminars and lectures related to resistance studies to fully take advantage of the global potential of the Internet. If you have more clips related to resistance studies, please drop a line to christopher.kullenberg@theorysc.gu.se. 

Blogosphere resistance against Internet Surveillance

Christopher Kullenberg September 18th, 2008

During the last few months there has been a critical debate in Sweden because of a law passed in June, allowing the National Defence Radio Establishment to monitor all Internet traffic. However, as a co-ordinated activity, a large number of bloggers started to form a public opinion through arguments, research and organisation. Right now, the government is facing a minor crisis, and the law can possibly be changed before taking effect on January the 1.st. Wiretapping Sweden has made a short documentary in English about the “blogosphere earthquake”, which is really worth seeing for those interested in the possible political consequences of digital resistance. It may be watched directly here, and downloaded in higher quality here. It features interviews with prominent bloggers, politicians, and activists. It is also aimed at an international audience, since this type of surveillance exists almost everywhere.   

Double call for papers on resistance panels.

Christopher Kullenberg August 30th, 2008

The Resistance Studies Network is calling for papers and presentations for a panel organised by Christopher Kullenberg at the Kurrents conference on Nov. 1 & 2. The panel is called Resistance Practices and Social Change. Please send abstracts to Christopher. 

 Simultaneously Karl Palmås, who has made several contributions to both the Network seminars and RSMag.org, is chairing a panel called Societies of Control and New Technologies of Surveillance

The conference will be very exciting and includes keynote speakers such as Antonio Negri and Yann Moulier Boutang. More reports and possibly even video streams will be posted. Please send your proposals as soon as possible, as time is quite rare.  

Ploughshares becoming Deleuze becoming ploughshares …

Per Herngren August 22nd, 2008

Disarmed military radar

With blacksmith hammers, Ulla Røder and Per Herngren disarmed a military radar and parts of the Test Range at SAAB Microwaves in Sweden, Thursday 26 June, 2008.

The Ploughshares group calling themselves, SAAB Microwave Becoming2 Ploughshares were arrested inside SAAB Microwave after half an hour. Beside the disarmament they also planted figs and talked with workers and guards.

The story/web page
Pictures
Deleuze philosophy

“Becoming2” (like a mathematical ‘becoming-squared’) in the middle of our name might look strange,” says Per Herngren. “During the ploughshares action, we worked together with Deleuze philosophers from Gothenburg University in Sweden. We were during one day plugged into each other. Together we examined how resistance and Deleuze’s philosophy will intensify each other. Deleuze highlights the double becoming rather than being: To become becoming, rather than to become something. To produce production rather than isolated actions! Resistance and philosophy are ongoing processes giving no final result. Deleuze forces us in the ploughshares to avoid thinking in “means and ends”, or the Big Action. An action are not the destination, but rather where we get on the train. For Deleuze resistance is about movement, speed, rest, slowness and intensity.”

” We do have the ability of direct intervention”, Ulla Røder believes. “It becomes a duty when there are violence and suffering in the world. We use nonviolence. Contrary to my friend Per, I do not believe that we are practicing civil disobedience, but rather upholding international law. It is SAAB Microwave which breaks the law delivering the missile firing system used during the war in Iraq.”

Beating swords into ploughshares

“The word of the prophet Micah makes us move”, explains Ulla Røder. “We beat swords into ploughshares. We do not protest against the missile firing system of SAAB Microwave or the military radar system. We choose to drop the protest as it becomes reactive and negative. The time has come to intervene and become creative.”

“they will hammer their swords into plowshares And their spears into pruning hooks; Nation will not lift up sword against nation, And never again will they train for war. Each of them will sit under his vine And under his fig tree, With no one to make them afraid,”

Micah 4:3-4

This quote is found in the text traditions from Islam, Christianity, and Judaism.

Ulla Røder

Ulla Røder, 53, from Denmark, disarmed a test laboratory for the nuclear submarine Trident system at Loch Goil, Scotland in 1999 together with the Trident Three Ploughshares group. They won the trial. In the week before the war on Iraq in 2003 Ulla Røder disarmed a Tornado jet going to be used for the attack in Iraq. Ulla has spent more than a year in jail for these actions and other non-violent direct actions. 

Per Herngren

Per Herngren served 15 months of a eight year sentence in the US having 1984, together with seven others in Pershing Plowshares, disarmed a Pershing II nuclear missile. During the first war on Iraq 1991, he and Gunfactory Plowshares disarmed two Carl Gustaf bazookas at FFV, Eskilstuna in Sweden. Together with people from Sweden and Germany Per Herngren initiated the Ploughshares movement in Europe in the mid eighties. He is 46 years old and lives in Fig Tree – a Jona House resistance community in Hammarkullen, Sweden. His books have been published in Swedish, Polish, and English.

The Ploughshares Movement

The Ploughshares have since 1980, disarmed hundreds of weapons, airplanes, helicopters, nuclear weapons, trident submarines. According to the estimated, and not scientific account of Per Herngren, the ploughshares movement has with blacksmith hammers disarmed more explosive powers than what have been used during all wars from the stone age until today.

Contact and information

Ulla Røder: bur200854 (-at-) hotmail.com
Per Herngren: perherngren (-at-) post.utfors.s

The story/web page
Pictures

Per’s web pages
Whole book Path of Resistance on internet.
Article on post protest

Blog

Mahmoud Darwish–A poet dies, but not his poetry. By Anjali Kamat

Magid Shihade August 16th, 2008

Op-Ed‘Record:

I am an Arab!’Anjali Kamat

Posted online: Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 0120 hrs  

Even in death, Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish was denied his dream of return

 

 Mahmoud Darwish, the incomparable poet of Palestinian experience, of exile, and of resistance, has slipped into the absence he so often invoked in his poetry. Darwish, who was born in the spring of 1942 in a Palestinian village that no longer exists, died last week in a hospital in Houston, Texas. He was sixty-seven years old, the poet laureate of the Palestinians, a towering figure in Arabic literature, and one of the greatest poets of the twentieth century. He had published over 30 volumes of poetry and prose, been translated into 35 languages, and received numerous awards including the 1969 Lotus Prize from the Union of Afro-Asian Writers, the 1983 Lenin Peace Prize, and the 2001 Lannan Foundation Prize for Cultural Freedom.

But Darwish’s unparalleled popularity in the Arab world extended far beyond literary circles. He enjoyed a rare iconic status that few poets since Pablo Neruda or Faiz Ahmad Faiz can claim. His public appearances drew excited crowds that could fill football stadiums, his writing caused heated debates in the Israeli Knesset, and his words have been immortalised as anthems of the Palestinian struggle by the immensely popular Lebanese musician Marcel Khalife.

Darwish’s own life played no small part in this strong identification between the poet and his homeland. He was born in Al-Birwa, a village in the Galilee, at a time when Palestine was under the British Mandate. The nakba or catastrophe of 1948 struck when he was barely seven years old, and Jewish militias destroyed Al-Birwa along with more than 400 other Palestinian villages. Darwish’s family fled to Lebanon. When they returned a year later to what used to be their home, their village no longer existed, and from the standpoint of the new state of Israel, neither did they. Darwish, like thousands of other Palestinians inside Israel, became an internal refugee living under a system of military rule and legally classified in terms only Orwell could match: a “present-absent alien.”

At twelve, the young writer was warned by a military governor of the dangers of subversive poetry when he recited a poem on the anniversary of Israel’s founding about Palestinian dispossession. But Darwish, afflicted with what he would later call “an incurable malady called hope,” never stopped writing, despite being jailed five times for his poetry. And as he wrote he became a voice for a people whose very existence was consistently denied, perhaps most famously by former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir who asserted that “there is no such thing as Palestinians.” One of his earliest published poems, “Identity Card,” begins with the declaration: “Record, I am an Arab!”

In 1971 as Darwish left the Galilee to study in Moscow, he was stripped of his citizenship by Israel. For the next quarter century he became the pre-eminent poet of exile, writing about resistance, memory, history, language, love, borders, homelands, and homelessness. He was only allowed to return to the West Bank in 1996, after the establishment of the Palestinian Authority. Until then Darwish was permanently on the move, living in and out of suitcases, airports, and hotel rooms in Beirut, Cairo, Amman, Tunis, Cyprus, and Paris. In Beirut Darwish wrote some of his most powerful verses about the Israeli siege of the city and massacres of Palestinians in Lebanon. Continuing his earlier political activism — he had been involved with the Israeli Communist Party and edited their newspaper — he joined the executive committee of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) in the early 1970s. His commitment to the Palestinian national struggle remained but his investment in organised politics did not last forever. Like his close friend Edward Said, Darwish also became deeply disillusioned with Yasser Arafat over the signing of the Oslo peace accords and resigned from the PLO in 1993.

Notwithstanding his close association with Palestinian history and experience, Darwish, like all great poets, does not belong to his people alone; the beauty of his art is universal. In his later years his writing expanded and engaged a variety of historical experiences, drawing from Greek mythology, Native American and Near Eastern history, and Qur’anic and Biblical references. But echoes of the Palestinian experience would remain. In his poem “The Speech of the Red Indian,” he wrote: “O you who are guests in this place, leave a few chairs empty/ for your hosts to read out / the conditions for peace / in a treaty with the dead.” Last year Darwish lamented: “How difficult it is to be Palestinian, and how difficult it is for a Palestinian to be a writer or a poet . . . How can he achieve literary freedom in such slavish conditions? And how can he preserve the literariness of literature in such brutal times?”

Indeed the times are brutal. Israel’s devastating blockade of Gaza continues, the daily humiliation and abuse of Palestinians at checkpoints shows no sign of abating, illegal Jewish-only settlements in the West Bank are expanding, and a just peace remains beyond reach. And even in death, Darwish was denied his dream of return. The Israeli authorities refused to allow him to be buried in his birthplace of Al-Birwa inside Israel. He was buried Wednesday in Ramallah after a state funeral attended by tens of thousands of mourners.

An exile since the age of seven, Darwish could only return to language and he found a home in poetry like few others have been able to. And his words will always remain, despite his absence, forever present, “beyond the last frontier / after the last sky.”  

The writer is an NYC-based producer for a daily radio and TV news show, Democracy Now! and the managing editor of Arab Studies Journal

http://indianexpress.com/story/348688.html  

Resistance and machinic phylum

Christopher Kullenberg August 15th, 2008

[this is a cross-post from panspectrocism.org]

This week I presented the panspec-project at the conference One or Several Deluzes in Cardiff. The slides are availible as flash or pdf. In the future I hope to publish the text online somewhere. Maybe, if there is an interest, I plan to make a special issue of the Resistance Studies Magazine about surveillance and resistance. If anybody is interested, please drop a line to christopher.kullenberg@theorysc.gu.se. Also, I will give a seminar on these matters in november with Dr. Karl Palmås.
However, the main argument can be summarised with this picture:

Panspectric technologies were initially developed with in signals intelligence. Now they are progressively being transferred to all aspects of every-day life, thus enforcing social order.

The notion of the panspectron was coined by Manuel DeLanda’s in his book War in the Age of Intelligent Machines (1991), referring mainly technological developments within signal intelligence during the second world war and onwards. According to DeLanda it differs from the panopticon in the nature of its gaze. The panopticist social diagram depended on the actual or potential human gaze employed to survey or induce a state of consciousness through the awareness of a possible surveyor. Warfare, according to Foucault, needed both discipline in order to function smoothly, as well as a bio-political State-apparatus to produce healthy soldiers ready to go to war. The model of the barrack was composed within a social diagram similar to that of the school and the prison, because it employed a system of surveillance, evaluation and discipline. This way, obedient subjectivities were produced necessary for the organisation of large-scale armies and their supporting activities. But the expressive assemblages of obedience, and their opposites - delinquency, depend on a certain content which, one might argue, is about to disappear.

The panspectron, thus, functions in another fashion according to DeLanda:

There are many differences between the Panopticon and the Panspectron /…/ Instead of positioning some human bodies around a central sensor, a multiplicity of sensors is deployed around all bodies: its antenna farms, spy satellites and cable-traffic intercepts feed into its computers all the information that can be gathered. This is then processed through a series of “filters” or key-word watch lists. The Panspectron does not merely select certain bodies and certain (visual) data about them. Rather, it compiles information about all at the same time, using computers to select the segments of data relevant to its surveillance tasks. (DeLanda 1991:XX)

Schools, barracks and prisons are becoming less all-encompassing as social institutions, even though it may be contested in the case of prisons. But I will argue, along with Deleuze (1991) that there has been an fundamental mutation, which may be followed through technological development and uses of technology. To map present day technologies of surveillance, concepts are desperately needed, and I propose to introduce the notions of phylum as a taxonomic marker of the ‘body plans’ of panspectric technologies. And in order to to trace their historical development, we need the a phylogenetic description of how technologies have emerged and evolved within our present day societies.

Also, I use this conceptual apparatus when dealing with Burma. Read more here.

CFP: RSMag 2008#4

Christopher Kullenberg August 14th, 2008

The Resistance Studies Magazine is calling for papers for issue 4/08 with a thematic focus on Chinese Resistance.

Guest Editors:

Wei Liu wie.liu(at)gmail.com and Jorgen Johansen johansen.jorgen(at)gmail.com

We will consider:

Theoretical and empirical articles on power, resistance and social change in Chinese history and ongoing actions and campaigns with a Chinese connection.

We have a special interest on the struggle in Tibet and the protest and counter-protests around the Olympic Games.

Articles on Internet, electronic resistance and struggle against censorship in China.

Reviews of scholarly articles and books.

Deadline for manuscripts: October 20.

For further information, please see our Submission guidelines on

Expected to be published in December 1.

Third semester of Resistance Seminars at Gothenburg University

Stellan Vinthagen August 12th, 2008

Dear friends at the Resistance Studies Network. The third semester of Resistance Studies Seminars are now ready! You can find the schedule below and updated information at the site above (See “Seminars”). The seminars - every second Thursday at 15-17 - are organised at the School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University and are regularly held in English (sometimes in Swedish). One week before the seminars (at least) a paper or background text is available at the site. The seminars are following a short network business-meeting (between 14-15 in the same room) in which we discuss the development and projects of our network. After the seminars we gather at restaurant Gyllene Prag across the street (from 17 and onwards…), where we drink and eat food, as well as discuss the seminar and resistance (or the latest movies, parties or relationship-gossips…).

You are welcome! Please feel free to forward the information to others!

Stellan Vinthagen, Seminar organiser RSN.

  1. Sep 11 2008 Peace Researcher Jörgen Johansen; Seminar on 9-11 and terrorism. “Osama Bin Laden should be thanked for the awakening!” The resistance is growing globally as a result of 9-11 and the ”War on Terror”. Which possible roads are probable, likely, wise and/or catastrophic? (see http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/tff/people/j_johansen.html)
  2. Sep 25 Visual Artist and former prof of Fine Arts Cecilia Parsberg; Seminar on Art, Culture and Resistance. About how art or our aesthetic expressions can be used as resistance, with examples from Sweden, Palestine and other places in the world. Film: “A Heart from Jenin”. Before the seminar, please read the paper (downloadable above at “Seminars”) and see previous projects at http://this.is/parsberg/)
  3. Oct 9 Seminar with Movies on Resistance (Stellan Vinthagen). One or several shorter movies on resistance relevant themes will be shown and discussed. If you have suggestions, contact Stellan; stellan. vinthagen @ resistancestudies. org (type without spaces in the address)
  4. Oct 23 Riff-Raff Co-Editor Per Ström; Seminarium om klasskamp och det “ansiktslösa motståndet” (Seminar is in Swedish, and about hidden work-place resistance). Per inleder diskussionen utifrån sin specialskrivna artikel för seminariet; ”Den politiska ekonomins väktare och desertörer: kapital, vänstern och det ansiktslösa motståndet.” Statistiken visar att fackligt motstånd och arbetarplatskamp minskat på senare decennier men stämmer det med verkligheten? Kan det vara så att kampen ändrat form under kapitalismens förändring och nya villkor? (Per is part of the editing team of http://www.riff-raff.se/)
  5. Nov 6 Dr Karl Palmås and Resistance Magazine Editor Christopher Kullenberg; Seminar on Surveillance, Power and Resistance. In late-modern societies in the West, as well as dictatorships, like Burma or China, surveillance is increasing and is developed into new forms. That changes the power structure, but also the articulation and expressions of resistance. Palmås and Kullenberg talks from their ongoing “Panspec-project”. (See http://rsmag.org/ and http://www.isk-gbg.org/99our68/)
  6. Nov 20 Assistant Prof. Bengt Brülde; Seminar on the Ethical Obligation to Resist. In some situations resistance is arguably an ethical obligation. (See http://maya.phil.gu.se/bengt/)
  7. Dec 4 PhD-Student Gunilla Priebe; Seminar on Resistance within the Science Discourse. Priebe talks about “Who is the expert? Re-defining scientific quality standards as a source of resistance towards colonially ascribed identities”. The theme is drawn from ongoing research (PhD project, dissertation June 2009). (See http://hum.gu.se/institutioner/idehistoria-och-vetenskapsteori/vetenskapsteori/utbildning/forskarutbildning/doktorander/gunilla/view?searchterm=approach)
  8. Dec 18 Post-Doc Fellow Patricia Lorenzoni; Seminar on Quilombo – stories about resistance and the right to land in Brazil. The seminar discusses histories of resistance and the right to land from the Case of Maroon descendants in Brazil. Quilombos were settlements of runaway slaves (Maroon) and other marginalised people in colonial Brazil that started in the 16th century. Although many quilombos were violently crushed, other survived at the margins of colonial society and are now negotiating their right to land. Lorenzoni’s dissertation dealt with violence, civilisation processes and anthropological understanding of the “savage”. (See http://hum.gu.se/institutioner/idehistoria-och-vetenskapsteori/personal/andra/patricia)

RSMag 2008#3 out now!

Christopher Kullenberg August 8th, 2008

[this message may be re-published anywhere]   - The third issue of the Resistance Studies Magazine is out now. You may read it immediately following this link. It has been a great pleasure to edit the five articles, and they are really worth reading. Here is a short summary of the articles from the editorial column: 

  • Drawing on a theoretical combination of James Scott’s conception of everyday resistance and Erwin Goffman’s symbolic interactionism, Carol Jo Evans develops an interesting case study of resistance within a North American Appalachian community.
  • Shane Gunderson discusses how resistance movements may gain momentum, as “popular intellectuals” facilitate and combine ideological work with political initiative. Gunderson shows, through a case-study, that structuring resistance in a more strategic fashion, through sequential actions, will increase the possibility of social change. 
  • Femke Kaulingfreks writes about the May 2008 riots in Copenhagen, and how such events, when taken seriously, seem to grow politics from the middle, thus shaping grounds for important political agency. What falls outside of normalisation, is not necessary disruptive in a counter-productive way, but may reveal inequalities and open up debates.
  • Thomas Riegler analyses the film The Battle of Algiers and how it has been caught up in debates on whether it has influenced resistance like an instruction manual in asymmetric warfare and guerrilla tactics, or not.
  • Finally, Adrian Bua deals with the problems of pluralism and democracy, and proposes how class analysis can contribute to a more sustainable alternative called pluralist socialism. 

Please download and read the articles, and watch out for a CFP for the 2008#4 Special Issue. 

Boycott the Olympic Games!

Stellan Vinthagen August 7th, 2008

The official start of the Olympic Games in Beijing are on Friday the 8th of August with the opening cermony. And the games goes on until the 24th of Aug - with thousands of participating athlets, thousands of journalists and VIP-people, and; billions of TV-viewers.

Despite the dictatorship of China and its regular surpression of oppositional movements (not limited to the student democratic movement, Tibet, Falung Gong, but also several ethnic minorities), despite its support for the dictatorship in Burma (including arms export and blockade of a UN-arms embargo), despite its non-conditional investments and arms export to African dictatorships (a region US imperialism has ignored for a long time).

But now there exists possibilities for us ordinary people to boycott the Olympic Games, not by our non-participation as athlet (despite our possibilities to break new world reccords…) but also by making our refusal to watch the TV-shows from the games! A Facebook campaign has started which tries to gather one million boycotting non-TV-viewers. Join the campaign and make your refusal to be entertained by the propaganda of China. Break the myth of a “non-political” Olympic Games!

The boycott of the TV-OG is connected to a support of Burma and consist of two specific demands of China:

1) Stops blocking a United Nations arms embargo on Burma and stops selling weapons to Burma’s regime, and

2) Ends its support for Burma’s regime.

If China does not change its policies, you will:

- Not watch the Beijing Olympics, especially the opening and closing ceremonies.
- Not purchase Olympics souvenirs and merchandise
- During the Olympics you will not purchase goods from Olympic corporate sponsors.

Join “Pledge& Join One Million People NOT Watching the Beijing Olympics For Burma” at  http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=13804897308

If you are not on Facebook go to: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1189/t/5102/signUp.jsp?key=3127

China’s Olympic Games’ Official Site Hacked

Stellan Vinthagen August 7th, 2008

On Wednesday TheColorOrange.net received an anonymous telephone call that hackers have changed the headlines of the official Chinese Olympic website into orange, the signal color of the human rights abuses in China.

In this connection the initiator of TheColorOrange campaign, Danish artist Jens Galschiot, declares:

“In fact I was rather sceptical about the message, but I’ve checked the website at stated that actually the headlines are orange. But I dare not say whether hackers or a humanitarian minded web designer are the originators.

If hackers critical to China have changed the color, we have to do with a highly sophisticated action, that will make a fool of China all over he world. It will also boost the focus on the use of Orange as a cunning way of criticising China during the OG in Beijing. Anyway we are not unequivocally enthusiastic about the support as we do not defend unlawful hacking of websites. In this case, however, we have to do wit a rather harmless hacking supportive of the human rights. These hackers must be exceptionally skilful if they have managed to make this small but very powerful change of the official OG websites.

We hold no sway whatsoever over the development of TheColorOrange project. The idea has spread on the Web like wildfire. Our homepage has had about 250,000 visitors and thousands will hang up orange cloth strips in their cities or wear something orange.

We expect that also in China many will use orange as a signal color. Athletes, politicians, journalists and others will display something orange during the games. Doing so, they will send a signal that something is going wrong in China. It may be an orange hat, camera bag, tie, pen, paper, dress, suit, bag etc. Even pealing an orange may be considered a poignant statement. In most cases the motive cannot be uttered, as neither the OIC nor the Chinese authorities will tolerate display of any symbols expressing criticism of China. The Orange supporters will have to say, with a wry smile, that they are fond of orange. The use of orange is the artifice that will allow everybody to participate in the Olympics and at the same time express their disapproval of the human rights violations in the country.”

For more info see http://www.thecolororange.net

The Olympic Games Official Site: http://en.beijing2008.cn/

 

Site created that helps resistance against Surveillance in Sweden

Stellan Vinthagen August 6th, 2008

During the last months the new surveillance law (the FRA-law) in Sweden has been videly debated. The law makes mass-surveillance of mail-traffic, sms, phones, etc. possible of Swedes without suspicions of illegal activity. Internet company CEOs, conservative party officials, liberal newspapers, etc. have together with the normal oppositional crowd of anarchists, communists, liberal free-thinkers, hippies and hackers protested in many different forms. Now, after the law was adopted by the parliament, some MPs try to scrap it afterwards, despite voting for it when it was adopted…Others are mobilising the resistance to the new reality of surveillance of our digital-communication. A new site is helping people to use a standard text within their emials that will make FRA’s computorised search programmes to react. The standard text (which can be randomly developed at the site to create variation) contains a message saying things like: “Dear FRA, I have nothing to do with Al Qaida, and I don’t plan to plant any bombs, and am against terrorist attacks of all sorts…”.

“Hej FRA!
Det finns ingen anledning att läsa mitt mail. Jag har ingenting att göra med ETA, al-Jama’a al-Islamiyya eller Hamas. Jag har aldrig gjort Shahada eller tillverkat biologiska vapen, jag vet knappt ens vad Faqih betyder. Men tack för visat intresse!

PS. Terroristattacker kommer knappast att planeras över okrypterade mail. Sabba FRA-lagen på www.hejfra.se”

Since the search programmes of FRA look for certain key words (like “bombs”, “terrorism”, “Al Qaida”) the mail will be read by someone. The goal is to overburden the surveillance system by making too many mails necessary to read, thus raising the costs of the surveillance. We will have to wait and see if this will be effective, something that will depend on how many people that will use the site and its “polite resistance”. Check it out for yourself (only in Swedish) on www.hejFRA.se

Resistance in striated space

Christopher Kullenberg July 25th, 2008

Chinese authorities have set up special zones for protests during the olympics, which may take place two weeks before the inauguration of the games.

This, however, is not a typically Chinese strategy. During the olympic games in Athens and Salt Lake City, protests were limited.

With more than 253 million Internet users, and only 50 being imprisonated (which of course is 50 too many), there is a fundamental opposition between controlled surfaces, and the possibility of coordinated action. This tension is of course highly relevant to resistance studies.

The next number of the Resistance Studies Magazine will be a special issue on Chinese resistance and the Olympics. Watch out for a CFP in the near future!

Politics in everyday life

Safaa July 18th, 2008

I am now writing on a thesis about everyday politics and would like to continue on a thread written by Stellan Vinthagen in this blog the 5th of June.

The aim of the thesis is to outline different forms of everyday political acts. In studying organisations that deal with politics in everyday life I will try to see what, how and when individualised politics occur in Sweden. I can already now see that some organisations are dealing with hidden resistance, as the one Stellan wrote about, and others with more open acts that not necessarily could be called resistance.

In order to continue the categorisation I need to define what resistance is and what is not when comparing stealing from workplace, or foot-dragging, with buying fair trade or organic products. There are differences between the acts that need to be taken into consideration. They are close to categorisations such as “closer within system” or “more outside the system” (or the fields “encouraging” or “delaying” the system) or “within” or “outside norm”.

I agree with Stellan that it is highly interesting whether these informal, individual acts could be the start for uprisings. However, I was initially interested in this subject when thinking whether these individual acts could in themselves form a collective act, or even mobilisation. Though they seem to occur separately and unorganised I think that they could be collective as well. If anything, the individual acts are, according to me, organised within a discourse, especially the one of sustainable development. It dictates the time and place, and how to act.

And the qu